Thursday, February 25, 2016

STEMS^2 Research

My STEMS^2 Research (or rather the planning for it) is going fairly well.  I would really like to be further along than I am but two straight 7-day work weeks and 6-day work weeks the rest of the time (it's Spring afterall, Science-everything season) have made me less productive than I would like to be.

In the past week though I have been trying to catch up in between coaching Science Olympiad and Robotics (we are in a transition week right now because our first Botball documentation deadline is next Tuesday but at the same time the high school Science Olympiad team qualified for States last Saturday and we have 14 days to add 6 new events....)

Here's what I have been able to accomplish since my last blog post:

  • Met with my scientist collaborator to discuss the lesson sequence for my STEMS^2 unit.
    • She and her graduate students can come once a week, so we will hopefully start in March before Spring Break.
    • I will teach the days in between, with Fridays reserved for Discussion of Omnivore's Dilemma.
    • We are planning to add sustainability to the biodiversity studies which will tie in nicely with the book, Omnivore's Dilemma that the students are currently reading in English.
      • Dr. Butler will be preparing a list of the concepts that they plan to cover so that I can create a pre-/post- content survey.
    • I will be writing up lesson plans for the lessons that Dr. Butler and her students teach so that we can share them with other teachers (this is part of Dr. Butler's goal, to help teachers in the community).
  • Discussed my project plan with the Dean of Curriculum and Instruction at my school to get feedback on my parental and student agreement to be in study forms and approval to conduct my research with my 7th grade classes.
    • It was suggested that I add in a comparative component to better gauge the effect of the Scientist-Student partnership, where Dr. Butler would teach one class period and I would teach the same content to the other.  I am considering this but feel somewhat bad that one group of students would not get to interact with her and her graduate students.
    • Was given survey instruments focused on student attitudes towards Biology that I can adapt to "Science"
    • Also suggested to use "Concept Inventories" as we use with our students in Science to get more quantitative data.
  • Completed IRB training online
  • Drafted my IRB paperwork so that I can submit to the next deadline.
  • Read lots more papers about Scientist-School, Scientist-Teacher, Scientist-Student partnerships to inform myself of the different ways that they can operate and the potential challenges that I may face during the project.
  • Panda will be observing my class sometime next month or in April. :)
Here is what I need to do in the next week or so:
  • Create all of the surveys (content, attitude, concept inventory) that I plan to use.
  • Record the procedures I use (or plan to use) in administering surveys and lesson materials so that this can be included in my methods section.
  • Devise a strategy for coding responses to open-ended questions on surveys and student journals (from this week's reading, this sounds difficult so I may ask the CRDG researchers who work with data and project assessment for assistance if they have time)
  • Send letters and agreements home to students once I get IRB approval.
  • Find and read research papers on teaching sustainability since that is being added now.
  • Work with Dr. Butler to draft lesson plans for her lessons, especially if I will be teaching one class period exclusively.  Also need to discuss how she feels about this since she has been teaching both class sections in the past.
  • Set up a peer-observation.  Does anyone want to be observed?

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Developing Research Questions

Utilizing your research question conduct a google scholar search to vet your research question. Is there research in this field that can drawn upon? and/or has this research question already been answered?

Of my three research questions, #1, "How does collaboration with professional scientists affect scientists and students motivation and scientific skills?" seems to be the most extensively studied.  Collaborations or partnerships between university researchers and students in K-12 schools are becoming more and more common in all disciplines, not just science.  As the Next Generation Science Standards are adopted by states, more and more emphasis will be placed on scientific habits of mind, which are best learned from real-life, practicing scientists.  The nature of the studies previously conducted depends on the specific goal of each study, but all involve scientists working with science teachers and students which is helpful for me in terms of learning what has worked (and not worked) in the past with others setting up partnerships and collaborative learning.  I have been examining the methods they have used to get ideas for what I can focus on.  I am also involved in a project right now that is more teacher-scientist based, the OPIHI Project http://www.hawaii.edu/gk-12/opihi/index.shtml that will be done with my other students (9th graders) which I think I can compare to my experience with my 7th graders who will have direct student-scientist interactions.  Research related to topics similar to my questions #2 and #3 does exist and I found a few articles that I will see what I can pull from for my literature review and to get ideas for questions/assessments.  Here are some of my initial notes on the articles I read.

Key Points and Ideas from Research Articles
Bowman, C. D., Sherman, D. M., Arvidson, R. E., Nelson, S. V., & Squyres, S. W. (2003). Students and Scientists Test Prototype Mars Rover. Journal of Geoscience Education51(1), 29-34.
  • LAPIS Program
  • active participation designed to mirror the activities of the Athena science team members
  • distance learning (teleconferences every two weeks)
  • face-to-face interactions with mentor
  • science team members act as research partners
  • teachers support science learning, coordinate mission tasks and roles, facilitate interactions between students and mentors
  • empowerment evaluation
    • developing a mission, vision, or unifying purpose
    • taking stock or determining where the program stands including strengths and weaknesses)
    • planning for the future by establishing goals and helping participants determine their own strategies to accomplish program goals and objectives

Chinn, P. W., Abbott, I. A., & Kanahele-Mossman, H. Ua lele ka manu (The bird has flown): Science education from Indigenous/local/place-based perspectives.
  • "In 1999, the US National Research Council identified 3 research and 5 action priorities for sustainability science. The following are relevant to Indigenous inquiry in Hawai‘i (pp. 10-13, NRC, 1999):
    • Research Priority 1. Develop a research framework that integrates global and local perspectives to shape a "place-based" understanding of the interactions between environment and society. 
    • Research Priority 3. Promote better utilization of existing tools and processes for linking knowledge to action in pursuit of a sustainability transition.
    • Action Priority 5. Restore degraded ecosystems while conserving biodiversity elsewhere. From 1994 to its removal a few years ago following a review by outside consultants, 
  • science teachers and an archeologist/educator exchanged ideas on Hawaiian indigenous inquiry and its methods for several months
    • digitally recorded conversations
    • notes on informal and telephone interviews
    • emails exchanged
      • Five major themes related to Indigenous inquiry methods and K12 science education.
      • 1. Role of hula, chants, ‘ōlelo no‘eau, and mo‘olelo;
      • 2. Role of Indigenous identity and cultural expectations;
      • 3. Role of place-based cultural practices;
      • 4. Role of Indigenous knowledge and practices in curriculum and instruction;
      • 5. Institutional, cultural, and societal barriers to Indigenous inquiry. 
  • suggests a Hawaii-oriented framework with four process elements: 1) developing a Hawaiian sense of place, 2) mālama, caring Chinn, et al Ua Lele Ka Manu: Indigenous/local inquiry methods 22 for/monitoring/restoring a familiar place; 3) kuleana, recognizing that the right to use resources come with responsibility; and 4) conducting inquiry oriented to sustaining a healthy social ecosystem.

Falloon, G. (2013). Forging School–Scientist Partnerships: A Case of Easier Said than Done?. Journal of Science Education and Technology22(6), 858-876.
  • 6 case studies completed
  • 12 schools (19 teachers)
  • scientists A-F
  • qualitative data
    • individual cases, across the cases
  • Likert questionnaire
  • Predominant themes used to classify across-case data
    • effect of partnership design and planning
    • partnership breadth and perception of value
    • the effect of partnership establishment processes
    • partnership viability concerns
  • identified principles and processes associated with forming partnerships
    • collaborative planning
    • mutual benefit
    • shared risk, responsibility, and organizational structure
    • equal partner status
    • establishment of a shared partner space
  • account of challenges faced
  • limitations of sample size

Hall-Wallace, M., & Regens, N. L. (2003). Impact of K-12 Partnership on Science Teaching. Journal of Geoscience Education51(1), 104-113.
  • data collected more on GK-12 fellows (college students) and teachers but great descriptions of the methods used and their efficacy for the needs of the evaluation of the study
  • mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods
    • student journal analysis - most effective means of evaluating quality and progress of program, but most difficult to evaluate quantitatively
    • surveys of knowledge
    • attitude surveys - measure fellows' attitudes
    • exit surveys and interviews - surveyed fellows and teachers who worked with a fellow for more than six weeks

Richards, L. (2013). Hawaiian Culture and High School Biology: Symbiosis.
  • mixed methods action research
  • investigate how the integration of cultural concepts into traditional curriculum impacts students’ learning of science
  • quantitative - pre- and post-surveys
  • qualitative - focus group, small group, reflections (all students)
  • student research project about the place of study to be organized into five sections: introduction, cultural background, ecological study, impacts on the ‘äina, and discussion and conclusions
  • Outcomes
    • Secondary students recognized the indigenized biology curriculum. By the end of the study, 97% of students could name at least one example of Hawaiian culture-based curriculum
    • The curriculum supports Native Hawaiian student learning, as evidenced by the triangulated results which include several types of quantitative and qualitative data. Five findings (See Table A3) demonstrate positive impact...
    • Students reported that as a result of the curriculum integration, they are able to make connections to the content, understand concepts easier, find relationship with the material, and learn and process complex biology concepts. In the pre- to post-survey comparison, students showed an increase in their understanding of biological concepts through the integration of Hawaiian culture. They were increasingly able to apply science to their context of self, family, community, and world.

Other articles to read:
DeGrazia, J. L., Sullivan, J. F., Carlson, L. E., & Carlson, D. W. (2001). A K-12/university partnership: Creating tomorrow's engineers. Journal of Engineering Education90(4), 557.

Forbes, A., & Skamp, K. (2013). Knowing and learning about science in primary school ‘Communities of Science Practice’: The views of participating scientists in the MyScience initiative. Research in Science Education43(3), 1005-1028.

HANSEN, T. A., KELLEY, P. H., & HALL, J. C. (2001, November). The Moonsnail Project: a collaborative research partnership between middle schools and universities. In GSA Annual Meeting, November 5-8, 2001.

Hansen, T. A., Kelley, P. H., & Hall, J. C. (2003). Moonsnail Project: A Scientific Collaborations With Middle School Teachers and Students. Journal of Geoscience Education51(1), 35-38.

Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development58(2), 137-154.

Rye, J., Landenberger, R., & Warner, T. A. (2013). Incorporating concept mapping in project-based learning: Lessons from watershed investigations.Journal of Science Education and Technology22(3), 379-392.

Stamp, N., & O'brien, T. (2005). GK—12 Partnership: A Model to Advance Change in Science Education. BioScience55(1), 70-77.

Share your research/project question and explain how you have arrived at this specific question

Here are my modified research questions from last week.  In Chapter 5 Methods (Maxwell), "Decisions about data collection," are discussed and I felt that the section called "The Relationship Between Research Questions and Data Collection Methods (p. 100-102) really helped me to understand how my research questions relate to the data that I will collect and especially how to use my methods to my advantage in doing so.  Maxwell states that there has often been confusion about research questions and data collection methods and that the later will depend strongly on the "actual research situation and on what will work most effectively in that situation to give you the data you need (p. 100)."  I now better understand that research questions are what you want to learn and data collection methods are what you ask to gain that understanding (p. 77, 101).  This helped me to think about my data collection instruments (questionnaires, pre- and post-assessments, and questioning strategies, and casual observations) more as tools to understanding the big picture through many different lenses.  Also in this chapter, I was reminded of the importance of understanding one's place and the places of others when he mentioned that many cultures find the asking of questions to be taboo or in opposition to one's cultural practices and norms (Maxwell, p. 101).

In Chapter 9, Maxwell discusses "Qualitative Procedures" including data collection procedures, which listed data collection types (Table 9.2, p. 179), many of which I had previously thought would be good ways to collect data.  This table includes options within each type as well as advantages and limitations, which helped me to narrow down which strategies I will initially use as well as provide me with options in case I begin collecting data and find that I do not have enough information to answer my research questions.  My primary data collection will be through documents such as pre- and post-assessments, student work, and journals; audio-visual materials including photographs and videos of students during class; and observations as a participant (by myself and by Dr. Butler and her students).

My research questions from last week with modifications are below.  My main changes were to eliminate my assumptions (Maxwell, p. 75) about what I expect to learn during my research.  I was previously assuming that in #1 "collaborating with professional scientists," would "improve [my] students' motivation and skills," in #2 that "student learning would be [enhance[d]," and in #3 that the use of Google applications would "facilitate rapid exchange of data and ideas."  I feel that my questions are now less biased and more open-ended rather than too narrow, as they should be in qualitative research.  I also feel that I will be able to draw conclusions based on the data I collect because I will design my data collection instruments to incorporate a wide variety of measures.

Modified Research Questions (1/27/2016)
  1. How does collaboration with professional scientists improve affect scientists and students motivation and scientific skills in ecological sampling techniques as compared to the science teacher alone?
  2. How does the knowledge of mo'olelo, history, and culture of a place (such as an ahupua'a) enhance influence student learning in science?
  3. How does the use of Google applications facilitate rapid affect exchange of data and ideas with students in other states and countries?

Thursday, January 28, 2016

Research Design Process

Revisit your research/project design within the context of the assigned readings. Using the language of the assigned readings to explain your research/project design.

My Plan B research is focused on determining the effectiveness and benefits of a collaboration between young scientists (my students) and community partners who are professionals in their field (UH professor and graduate students).  I have had to narrow my focus a bit based on the feedback from last week's Spotlight.  I'm actually really glad that I went so early in the semester because I got lots of good feedback and ideas last week :)

One of the most helpful was regarding my research questions.  I have five which is definitely too many and while I stated that I was going to collect both quantitative and qualitative data, making my research a mixed methods project according to Creswell (2013) because it "incorporates elements of both qualitative and quantitative approaches (p. 3)" I think that most of my research questions were attempting to generate measurable data, such as numbers in order to gauge student interest and progress.

My original research questions with my categorization and possible ways of collecting data and observations based on reading Creswell, Chapter 1 and new ideas from STEMS^2!

Research Questions
  1. How many species of organisms in local ecosystems can students recognize and name before and after conducting biological sampling? (quantitative - concept inventories or concept mapping, Wordle)
  2. In what ways do students describe their place? (qualitative - interviews, small group discussions, journaling including drawings)
  3. How do students’ attitudes about food change as they learn where their food comes from? (quantitative - survey, and qualitative
  4. Can collaboration with students at schools in other states or countries be enhanced by the use of technology such as Google Classroom applications? (qualitative - interviews, small group discussions, journaling) Focus more on the collaboration with other schools effect on students' learning/motivation
  5. What ecological issues are students most interested in? (qualitative - interviews, small group discussions, journaling, project proposal)

Creswell states that mixed methods combines the two forms together which strengthens the study overall compared to a purely qualitative or quantitative study (2013, p. 4).  After reading through the first Chapter of Creswell's book, I can see why I as well as many of my STEMS^2 classmates have chosen this research design, especially for the types of Plan B's that we are tackling.  Due to the strong culture-based, place-based, and technology-supported foci of our STEMS^2 units, we will need to collect both qualitative data (interpretation of meaning from observations) and quantitative data (objective measures of numbers and statistics).

In his chapter, Research Questions, Maxwell (2012) states that the statement of your final research questions does not always occur at the beginning of the design of a research study, but rather the questions are developed along the way in an "interactive design process, rather than being the starting point for developing a design (p. 73)."  He further states that "the function of your research questions is to explain specifically what your study is intended to learn or understand (p. 75)" which I feel I have sort of missed the mark on in my original questions in my Plan B Proposal.  Some of my questions are too general such as "Can collaboration... be enhanced?" and some may be too limiting and stated more like learning goals for my students, "How many species... can students name?"

As a scientist, I am used to thinking in terms of quantitative research while at the same time I record qualitative data to ensure that I am able to account for possible errors that may have occurred in my experiments.  Maxwell states that research questions will often need to evolve throughout the study, which is also true of scientific research.  As observations are made and anomalies found, researchers will think of other controls that need to put into place, other questions they want to explore, other data and observations to make, and modifications to protocols that need to be made.  Although I have not begun my study, I followed Maxwell's Exercise 4.1 (pp. 84) to attempt to improve my research questions and came up with these...  In order to incorporate more STEMS^2, I exchanged some of my research questions for one that addresses the effectiveness of incorporating sense of place.  I also lessened my focus on my specific learning goals for my students and increased focus on the overall examination of STEMS^2 

Modified Research Questions
  1. How does collaboration with professional scientists improve students motivation and skills in ecological sampling techniques as compared to the science teacher alone?
  2. How does the knowledge of mo'olelo, history, and culture of a place (such as an ahupua'a) enhance student learning in science?
  3. How does the use of Google applications facilitate rapid exchange of data and ideas with students in other states and countries?
Comments are greatly appreciated!




Monday, November 2, 2015

STEMS^2 Unit Musings & Ideas for Community Collaboration

During our discussion today of the rubric for our STEMS^2 units, I realized that there were many more dimensions to the unit than I considered when I did my post last week and thought I would expand on a few here while my thoughts are fresh.

Community Involvement in Multiple Ways
I especially liked that my breakout group (#1) discussed in detail not only how different types of community partnerships could be and how we would also want the community to be involved in the culminating project or presentation that students would do as their summative assessment.  At our recent WASC visit, one of the areas of improvement is for us to publicize more the good things that our students are doing.  This was geared more towards the community outside of our school, but I think it is important to include students in other grade levels, families, teachers, and stake-holders such as alumni and Governing Board members as well because those are the people who represent your school and can share with others about what is being done.

Seeking and Forming Community Partnerships
One concern raised when we were writing descriptions in the STEMS^2 rubric tonight was that often it is difficult to find community partners that are appropriate for the units that we may be planning, but several people voiced great ideas of where we should look beyond the place we would usually look (community organizations and businesses), including parents of students, teachers who have interests outside of school (as we have seen within our group, we have many talents besides being great teachers), alumni, and so on.  If these stakeholders know that innovative and multidisciplinary lessons are being taught at your school, they may be more likely to offer their expertise and resources.  As mentioned during our learning journeys, we have many kupuna, who can contribute to learning in many different ways.

Ongoing Experiences with Community Partnerships
Last week I met with a UH professor who approached me two years ago with an idea to connect my 7th grade students (her daughter was my student at the time) to students at a school that she had visited on a small island in Papua New Guinea during her research on frogs there in the summer.  This was something that I had not previously thought of, but we have since formed a relationship with the teachers and students at this school and she and I met recently to discuss our plans for this year.

In the first year, we started small, with Dr. Butler doing presentations about the frogs she studies and the way of life in Papua New Guinea for my students to compare to their lives here.  The students then exchanged letters.

Letters from Papua New Guinea students to ULS students:


Letters to Papua New Guinea students from ULS students





Last year we did surveys of Biodiversity and compared the foods we eat here with those common in Papua New Guinea.  Below are some photos of some of the things that my students have done with Dr. Butler that contributed to the exchange between our students.

Sweep Net Sampling


Quadrat Sampling




We have even gotten her graduate students involved as well as my Research Science high school students who happen to have class right after the 7th graders who were interested in learning about sampling techniques.


Examples of insects that were captured.  Next students identified these to the level of Insect order and the researchers helped them to construct graphs that were used to compare biodiversity between several locations on campus.
Last Thoughts
This year we are looking to write up our curriculum so that the protocols we use can be shared with other teachers such as my new collaborator in Washington state, another teacher who is also interested in Biodiversity.  Since this is perfect timing with our STEMS^2 unit, I think that this will be my primary focus for my Plan B project and am looking forward to developing these rather isolated lessons into a cohesive unit plan and to integrate more of the other STEMS^2 layers of place into the plans.  I already have the 7th grade English teacher (who has been helping students with their letters) on board and will work on setting up meetings with the 7th grade Social Studies and Mathematics teachers to see how we can all work together and what this unit might tie-in to what they will be teaching in the Spring semester.

Monday, October 26, 2015

Criteria for a Quality STEMS^2 Unit

I have been thinking about my STEMS^2 unit since we first began our Learning Journeys in the summer, but I am still not sure which grade (7th or 9th) I want to develop it for.  I will probably modify one or more existing units for each grade to become STEMS^2 units but focus on one to teach and evaluate this year for my Plan B project because I think that it will be quite difficult to develop one high quality unit let alone two while we ourselves are still in the process of understanding how all of the parts of STEMS^2 can fit together and complement each other.  However, we will see how things go....

Qualities and Characteristics of a Strong STEMS^2 Unit

A strong STEMS^2 unit should include both elements from all of the STEM disciplines (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) as well as the S^2 disciplines (Social Sciences and Sense of Place).  Each discipline does not need to be present in each lesson of the unit, but overall, each should have a prominent focus in multiple lessons so that students can see that their "subjects" are not as distinct as they often seem and can be used together towards learning objectives.  For example, if the students are learning about how plants use sunlight for energy, they will definitely be learning about the Science of the process of photosynthesis by growing plants and making observations, but will also need to use Mathematics to make comparisons and calculations and English Language Arts when reading articles about growing plants and to write their lab reports.  Including discussions about the history of agricultural practices and the current ideas about hybrids, GMOs (genetically modified organisms), and organic farming brings Social Studies into the unit.  Discussing these topics in reference to former and current practices in Hawaii and students' family practices (many students have small gardens at home or shop at farmer's markets) brings in a sense of place.  Students should be encouraged to share their own experiences and listen to others to broaden their understanding.

While there is debate about the role of National standards (Glatthorn, Carr, & Douglas, 2001), I believe that learning objectives should be aligned with the National and State Standards corresponding to the disciplines of study, such as the Next Generation Science Standards (Science and Engineering), Common Core State Standards (Mathematics and Language Arts), and NCSS National Standards for Social Studies in order make sure that the integrated unit is addressing both relevant content and practices from each discipline.  A disciplinary approach to teaching provides modeling for students of how professionals in those fields do their work and encourages students to see themselves as practitioners of that discipline rather than "students."  This along with a constructivist curriculum in which "learners construct meaning from what they experience (Glatthorn, Carr, & Douglas, 2001)," is a key component of the learning experience at ULS.

In designing the unit, assessment of students' learning must be used to gauge student understanding and progress throughout the unit, in formative assessments, as well as at the conclusion of the unit (summative assessment) to ensure that learning objectives were met.  The summative assessment does not necessarily need to be an exam or test, but should be a product that allows the student to demonstrate their understanding and mastery of the key ideas of the unit.  Offering options for key assessments throughout the unit will allow students to show what they have learned in ways that best fit their personal interests and strengths, such as making a model, composing a story, drawing a comic, or acting out a skit and encourage other students to consider different ways of explaining key concepts and ideas.

Engaging Student/Teacher Experiences

In order to provide engaging experiences for the students and teachers, the unit should be designed around just a few essential questions so as not to spread the focus too wide and allow students to integrate new knowledge and understanding into their existing framework (their sense of place) at a pace that is comfortable.  Providing a variety of learning experiences and delivery methods (demonstrations, guest speakers, lectures, inquiry investigations, peer-teaching, presentations, etc.) and assessments that address different learning styles will help to ensure that all learners needs are met.

The students and teachers involved should be wholly committed to being open to new ideas in order to fully immerse themselves in the connections between disciplines and within disciplines.  As emphasized in NGSS, cross-cutting concepts allow students to apply general information across different scientific disciplines which encourages students to recognize connections and think less in terms of separate subjects and ideas.

Unit Length

Glatthorn, Boschee, Whitehead, and Boschee (2005) define a unit as, "an organized set of related learning experiences offered as part of a course of study, usually lasting from one to three weeks" that is often "organized around a single, overarching concept (p. 18)."  I think that the STEMS^2 unit that I develop will need to be closer to three weeks or perhaps even longer to fully immerse my students in the material and include a field experience such as a Learning Journey and/or visits from professionals in the disciplines.  The length of the unit is not as important as the depth into which we explore and discuss the key ideas, so it will likely depend on the specific topic of the unit and the learning objectives that are chosen.  If growing plants or taking observations over a long period of time is involved, the unit may span a couple of months, but be integrated into a larger unit that has several subunits to accommodate the amount of time needed for a longitudinal study.

REFERENCES

Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F. A., Whitehead, B. M., & Boschee, B. F. (2015) The Nature of
Curriculum. Curriculum Leadership: Strategies for Development and Implementation
(pp. 3-32). Retrieved from

Glatthorn, A. A., Carr, J. F., & Harris, D. E. (2001). Thinking About Curriculum. Curriculum
Handbook: Planning and Organizing for Curriculum Renewal. Retrieved from

Monday, October 12, 2015

Head above water "snorkeling"

20151011

With a lot on my "plate" and mind lately, I was fortunate to have a chance to slow down and smell the fresh sea breezes and spend some time exploring the expansive Ahua Reef near "Dog Beach" at Hickham AFB.

Since my 9th graders are close to a week away from finishing our Physical Oceanography unit on mapping, here is a more accurate location (also known as an absolute location rather than a relative location).

Spherical Coordinates: 21.315231, -157.958262

In Decimal Degrees: 21.31531°N, 157.958262°W

In Degrees, Minutes, Seconds: 21°18'55" N, 157°57'30" W

*Here is a nifty site that converts from decimal degrees to degrees, minutes, seconds if you don't have a teacher like me that makes my students do the actual calculations themselves to understand how each degree is broken down into minutes and seconds ;)


This excursion was actually requested by a friend of mine whose boyfriend has recently become obsessed with collecting shells.  It also required my boyfriend to tag along so that we could get on base, so the four of us headed out around 10:00 a.m.

The water is very shallow and somewhat murky making visibility poor.  Even half a mile out from the shore, I could stand on the sandy/silty bottom and the water was only up to my chest.  First exciting sighting was black brittle stars, Class Ophiuroidea.



There were also many black collector urchins that I think are called hawa'e maoli.  Here is one of my favorite articles about them from 2009 in the Star Advertiser.  Susan Scott's column always has interesting ocean-related information. http://www.staradvertiser.com/columnists/20110214_Sea_urchins_the_perfect_janitors_to_keep_Kaneohe_coral_clean.html?id=116145179


Panoramic view from the water...  Diamond head is to the far right of the photo, a very faint outline, Nanakuli mountains on the far left.



There wasn't much besides low, dead coral beds in the middle, with the occasional footlong sea cucumber, so I headed west towards the higher reef where fishermen were standing knee deep in the water. http://www.waikikiaquarium.org/experience/animal-guide/invertebrates/echinoderms/sea-cucumbers/



Here in the more lively reef, there were beautiful but bleached coral heads which means they had recently either lost their zooxanthellae or expelled them for some reason, possibly in response to higher ocean temperatures and increased photosynthesis (see some informative readings below).



Lots more pink and pale green rock boring sea urchins and marine sponges were embedded in nooks and crannies in the reef.  http://www.waikikiaquarium.org/experience/animal-guide/invertebrates/echinoderms/rock-boring-urchin/


Having some time to myself (I was not snorkeling due to having scratched by eye the day before) I was able to practice my "kilo" while at the same time testing my memory of marine invertebrates. Teaching Marine Science has greatly increased my interest in the live versions of the organisms whose former homes and skeletons (shells and exoskeletons) I have collected on shorelines since I was little.  Matching the whole organisms to their spines, shells, and fragments is a kind of inquiry process that I really enjoy, it's like detective work.  Recalling common names, scientific names, classifications, and learning Hawaiian names is also fascinating to me.  I took pictures of everything I could recognize as well as what I could not to take back with me to help tell my stories.

Next I spotted something very unmistakably pink near a part of the reef that was exposed.  "Never turn your back to the ocean" is very wise advice, so it was difficult to get close enough without turning my back or facing the oncoming waves in the knee deep water.


The pink splotches turned out to be coral!  Cauliflower coral, also known as ko'a and Pocillopora meandrina http://www.waikikiaquarium.org/experience/animal-guide/invertebrates/coral/cauliflower-coral/















While taking the long trek back to shore, I wished that my students could come out to see this, or at least something similar.  56 students at one time would be impossible.  28 with several additional chaperones would be manageable if we were allowed to go this deep in the water.  Place-based learning is definitely more difficult to accomplish when safety is a concern.  The OPIHI project would definitely help facilitate a shoreline field study in the Spring, so I guess that's my next application!

Sunday, September 27, 2015

Sense of Place

We have been discussing sense of place and trying to define it during our STEMS^2 experience thus far, but I actually began thinking about place and sense of place last December when I began my journey with the Ethnomathematics/STEM Institute "E7" ethnos.  I arrived at the Portables, knew exactly where to park, although I was dropped off that day because my fractured foot meant that my mom was driving me around, and ambled slowly up the steps to be greeted by hugs and smiles from the hui advisors and my soon-to-be E7 buddies.  Very quickly, we would later comment, we felt as if we had known each other forever.  Over the course of the next few months, we shared about where we were from through several fun activities the first of which was bringing three artifacts to show and explain about ourselves.  I brought my senior yearbook, a daruma with one eye still unpainted, and something else which now slips my mind.  We shared information with each other on the second day we had met that many of us had not uttered to any other person before.  These small items helped us to understand where each other was coming from, our senses of individual place, our perceptual dimensions of place.

In STEMS^2 we did the same when we shared who we were bringing with us to various places, our makana, and our STEMS^2 notebook organization.  Each of these things helps us to understand pieces of what make up each other which is essential for our interactions within the group.  Sensitivity to and empathy for each others' sense of place rather than complete understanding of or agreement with is essential for relationships in the group.  This extends to our classrooms, meaning that we need to ask our students to share their sense of place and to respect and acknowledge each others' places.



Through service learning, a trek up and down to Kalaupapa, and late-night stargazing, E7 formed shared memories of experiences, a collective sense of belonging, and a group mentality that is a sociological dimension of place.





In my classroom, the sociological dimension of place is defined by jobs students take on (attendance monitors, window monitors, energy monitors, paper passer-outers, erasers, praisers, and SNB monitors) to help our class run smoothly, to the point where when there is a substitute teacher, the students can almost do everything themselves.  The eraser job is new this year, suggested by students to help speed up transition time during class.  Input from students is solicited on nearly a daily basis and each class period may have a different sequence of instruction if it fits their collective learning style better or students may elect to continue to focus on a particular topic in more detail and then do the unfinished topics for homework.


I am lucky that my school is almost by definition one that welcomes experimentation in the classroom, not only in terms of students conducting experiments in their science classes to help them form knowledge (all science classes are inquiry-based), but in our teaching pedagogies.  Ideologically, a laboratory school is a working "laboratory" where experimentation and innovation is supported.  Teachers are given the opportunity to submit proposals for "research projects" which are reviewed by the administration and the entire faculty and approved or disapproved for the following school year.  Regular updates on the research and its outcomes are presented at faculty meetings which often inspire other faculty members or departments to propose research projects of their own.  This ideological dimension of place can also sometimes overlap with political and ecological dimensions of place.  ULS's physical space is actually not its own.  We pay a fee to use University of Hawaii at Manoa (UHM) classrooms, MPB, outdoor spaces, as well as historic buildings (Castle Memorial Hall) so we are not at liberty to do whatever we please at any given time.  Recent installations of water dispensing stations and ceiling fans in the cafeteria/MPB had to approved by UHM first and then paid for by us.  Future plans for renovation of UHS 3 will likely take many years to come to fruition, so we celebrate small achievements and gains.

Another example of the ideological, political, and ecological dimensions of ULS' place is our garden project.  Our $750 grant from Chevron is an alternative source of funding that will help ULS steer funds toward other student-directed projects and programs but is limited by the permissions we have from UHM in terms of what trees and plants we can remove or even trim in the garden courtyard.  In addition, stakeholders such as alumni have ideas about what their vision for the garden is based on what it was used for during their time at ULS (student assemblies) which are in opposition to my memories of Aunty and Uncle's lush garden of native plants.  Our intentions to improve the space and make it a learning space for not just Hawaiian studies, Hula, and Science but for the whole school have met challenges that we must first work to understand (those senses of place) and then work with rather than against to make our collective vision come true.  Collaboration will be necessary but needs a foundation of understanding of place from many different dimensions and perspectives so our first step will be to collect information through a questionnaire on what different stakeholders envision, and then to sit down and discuss our hopes to create a plan together.