In STEMS^2 we did the same when we shared who we were bringing with us to various places, our makana, and our STEMS^2 notebook organization. Each of these things helps us to understand pieces of what make up each other which is essential for our interactions within the group. Sensitivity to and empathy for each others' sense of place rather than complete understanding of or agreement with is essential for relationships in the group. This extends to our classrooms, meaning that we need to ask our students to share their sense of place and to respect and acknowledge each others' places.
Through service learning, a trek up and down to Kalaupapa, and late-night stargazing, E7 formed shared memories of experiences, a collective sense of belonging, and a group mentality that is a sociological dimension of place.
In my classroom, the sociological dimension of place is defined by jobs students take on (attendance monitors, window monitors, energy monitors, paper passer-outers, erasers, praisers, and SNB monitors) to help our class run smoothly, to the point where when there is a substitute teacher, the students can almost do everything themselves. The eraser job is new this year, suggested by students to help speed up transition time during class. Input from students is solicited on nearly a daily basis and each class period may have a different sequence of instruction if it fits their collective learning style better or students may elect to continue to focus on a particular topic in more detail and then do the unfinished topics for homework.
I am lucky that my school is almost by definition one that welcomes experimentation in the classroom, not only in terms of students conducting experiments in their science classes to help them form knowledge (all science classes are inquiry-based), but in our teaching pedagogies. Ideologically, a laboratory school is a working "laboratory" where experimentation and innovation is supported. Teachers are given the opportunity to submit proposals for "research projects" which are reviewed by the administration and the entire faculty and approved or disapproved for the following school year. Regular updates on the research and its outcomes are presented at faculty meetings which often inspire other faculty members or departments to propose research projects of their own. This ideological dimension of place can also sometimes overlap with political and ecological dimensions of place. ULS's physical space is actually not its own. We pay a fee to use University of Hawaii at Manoa (UHM) classrooms, MPB, outdoor spaces, as well as historic buildings (Castle Memorial Hall) so we are not at liberty to do whatever we please at any given time. Recent installations of water dispensing stations and ceiling fans in the cafeteria/MPB had to approved by UHM first and then paid for by us. Future plans for renovation of UHS 3 will likely take many years to come to fruition, so we celebrate small achievements and gains.
Another example of the ideological, political, and ecological dimensions of ULS' place is our garden project. Our $750 grant from Chevron is an alternative source of funding that will help ULS steer funds toward other student-directed projects and programs but is limited by the permissions we have from UHM in terms of what trees and plants we can remove or even trim in the garden courtyard. In addition, stakeholders such as alumni have ideas about what their vision for the garden is based on what it was used for during their time at ULS (student assemblies) which are in opposition to my memories of Aunty and Uncle's lush garden of native plants. Our intentions to improve the space and make it a learning space for not just Hawaiian studies, Hula, and Science but for the whole school have met challenges that we must first work to understand (those senses of place) and then work with rather than against to make our collective vision come true. Collaboration will be necessary but needs a foundation of understanding of place from many different dimensions and perspectives so our first step will be to collect information through a questionnaire on what different stakeholders envision, and then to sit down and discuss our hopes to create a plan together.